If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. safe distance to live from cell phone tower are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In what is a safe distance from a cell tower is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.