If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. what is a safe distance from a cell tower can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.
While this sounds like something that's good however, those living close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For safe distance to live from cell phone tower , a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.
This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.