If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. safe distance to live from cell phone tower are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. what is a safe distance from a cell tower 's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in various possible harms, like the development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, those living close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.