If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.
While this sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.