If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. safe distance to live from cell phone tower could lead to many potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. safe distance to live from cell phone tower are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.