If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
Find out more are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. safe distance from cell tower 's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.
While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
what is a safe distance from a cell tower ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.